Wednesday, September 28, 2011

State of Endless War

By Daniel Greenfield 

In his UN speech, Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority used the word “peace” twenty-eight times. “We believe in peace,” he said. But what sort of peace he believes in is another matter.

Abbas began his statehood campaign with the “Mother of Martyrs,” a mother of seven imprisoned terrorists, four of them murderers, two of whom were involved in suicide bombings, one of whom was a member of Hamas.

One of her sons, Nasser Abu Hmeid, specialized in decapitating fellow Arab-Muslims who were enemies of Fatah. Hmeid had been jailed for murdering nine Arabs, and was released in 1999 as part of a peace deal. He joined the Palestinian police forces as an “interrogator” and then moved on to the notorious Tanzim unit, which was responsible for numerous murders of Israeli civilians. Two years later, Israel finally arrested him and shoved him back into prison.

This is the real face of the proposed Palestinian state. A brutal totalitarian regime funded by US money and dedicated to the murder of political opponents and the genocide of the Jewish people.

Abbas speaks of peace at the UN — “We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peace-making” — but to the home crowd, the message is quite different.

On Al-Jazeera, Fatah Central Committee Member Abbas Zaki explained the reasoning:
When we say that the settlement should be based upon these borders, President Abbas understands, we understand and everyone knows that the greater goal cannot be accomplished in one go. If Israel withdraws from Jerusalem, evacuates the 650,000 settlers, and dismantles the wall — what will become of Israel? It will come to an end.

If we say that we want to wipe Israel out…  it’s not acceptable policy to say so. Don’t say these things to the world. Keep it to yourself.
But many of his compatriots aren’t keeping it to themselves. A recent poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion showed that while Hamas’ popularity isn’t as high as it used to be, the vast majority of Palestinian Arabs agree with its genocidal charter.

80 percent of respondents agreed with the statement:

For our struggle against the Jews is extremely wide-ranging and grave… reinforced by successive battalions from the multifarious Arab and Islamic world, until the enemies are defeated and Allah’s victory prevails.
73 percent agreed with the genocidal Hadith quoted in the Hamas charter:
“The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.”
While a majority was in favor of diplomatic negotiations, it was also against two states for two peoples. The majority favored a one-state solution that would destroy Israel and opposed a two-state solution that would allow them to coexist side by side. And by a factor of two to one, they agreed with the statement that: “The real goal should be to start with two states but then move to it all being one Palestinian state.”

When three quarters of the population believes that there is a religious mandate to kill the Jews, it follows that two thirds will believe that negotiations are only a means of achieving the destruction of Israel.

Despite all the hype, the majority of Arab-Muslims in the West Bank and Gaza have no strong feelings about the statehood bid at the UN and the majority do not think that it will bring a state into being. A UN vote is not their endgame, the stones and the trees of the Hadith are.

It is impossible to understand the conflict without seeing it through the eyes of the Koran. There is no room for a permanent peace agreement with non-Muslims in Islamic theology. Such agreements are temporary measures until the “greater goal” of destroying them and subsuming their lands into the Ummah is achieved.

For the Muslim believer, the conflict with Israel is one phase of an apocalyptic struggle that began in 7th century Saudi Arabia and will conclude in the end times. And the vast majority of Muslims in the region are believers in that long struggle that will eventually end when Islam rules over the entire world.

While Israel and the West see hope for an agreement, the other side sees only one phase in a prolonged war. It doesn’t really matter what Israel puts on the table– the other side expects to get everything anyway because Allah promised it to them.

How do you negotiate peace with members of a genocidal belief system that permits deceit in pursuit of its goals? You make offers to them; they accept your concessions and continue the violence. That is what nearly two decades of negotiations have looked like. Across the administrations of three presidents, five Israeli prime ministers and two Palestinian Authority leaders– the same story has repeated itself again and again.

Those numbers hold their own clue. America and Israel change governments, but the PA’s leaders only leave when they die. The same poll cited before showed that Palestinian-Arabs don’t see themselves as part of the Arab Spring. Seventy-four percent agreed that they are not part of the Arab Spring revolutions. Sixty-four percent worry that the revolutions will bring instability to their territory. Fifty-nine percent disagree that the revolutions offer them new opportunities, and 47 percent disagree that they offer strong positive examples for change at home.

That brings us back to Hmeid, once imprisoned for beheading Arabs, now imprisoned for murdering Jews– and to the nature of what a Palestinian state really is. It’s not aspirational or democratic; it’s a giant refugee training camp for the next generation of cannon fodder in the genocidal wars of Islam.

The Palestinian Muslims have always recognized that there can be no end to the conflict as long as Israel continues to exist. Poll after poll has told the same story, the tale of a permanent war whose blood and charred metal is scattered across the sand and dust. UN statehood is just another phase in a long war which ends in mass murder. The Muslim world howls for genocide and the ranks of the US- and EU-funded militias, the Iranian-funded thugs and the rest of their ilk, are the cunning tools that they have selected for the task.

The state of Palestine is a state of war. The state of war will not end at the UN or the negotiating table. It will only end when the Muslim world stops believing that it has a right to kill in the name of its religion.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Integration, immigration and Islam-related problems

23 Suggestions for laws

Western politicians are free to pick and chose -- or take them all:
The basic goal is to fight immigrant crime with all means possible.
1) Illegal immigration is, yes, illegal, and should be punishable.
2) Criminal immigrants without citizenship must be deported.
3) All who are voluntarily involved in the use of Sharia courts must be punished.
4) Law and order must be imposed by all means in areas where the country's laws are challenged by Sharia, high crime rates and resistance against authorities.
5) Religions and religious teachings that preach hate, suppression or violence must be outlawed.
6) Religious organisations must declare and be able to prove that they do not preach teachings or condone religious books that incite criminal acts.
7) Immigrants must at arrival declare that they will support the country's constitution and follow the country's laws.
8) A main function of the EU should be to protect Europe against illegal immigration.
The basic goal is to protect and support the country's original culture and values.
9) Immigration from non-Western countries must be stopped. Time-limited working contracts should still be allowed.
10) Religious buildings that do not belong to the country's original culture should not be dominant (no minarets, no loud calls to prayer).
11) Religious customs (e.g. Islamization) that are not connected with the country's original culture should not be allowed in the public sector.
12) The state should actively protect and support the country's culture and values.
The basic goal is to make the lack of will or ability to integrate so unpractical and economically non-beneficial that repatriation will be the only attractive option.
13) Immigrant women should be informed about their rights to divorce, women's shelters, family planning and police protection.
14) Immigrants should pay for their own integration programme. The programme should include education in democracy, human rights and women's rights. It should also include information about how to support one's children's integration and education.
15) Immigrants should pass tests on the language, history, and politics of their new country. Immigrants should pay all expenses for language training and examination.
16) Repatriation (state-paid emigration and resettlement) should be offered to all immigrants from non-Western countries.
17) Immigrants should be able to support themselves economically.
18) Immigrants should earn their right to free medical care, to economic support for education and to social benefits. Immigrants must pay their own interpreters.
19) Immigrants who do not speak the country's language at an acceptable level must pay for special education for their children, because the parents are not able to support the children's schooling.
20) Refugees should be offered safety, food and medical care in refugee camps close to their home country. A Western level of living standard in Western countries for refugees is far too expensive and not necessary.
21) The country should put a much greater effort in fighting benefit fraud and tax fraud (both of which are widespread among immigrants).
22) The country should improve possibilities for the protection of women and their children who are fleeing violent family members.
23) Immigrants should put down a large deposit when entering the country. The deposit will be used to pay fines, taxes, expenses in connection with deportation, etc., if the immigrant breaks the rules of the country.
More suggestions? Please send them to:

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Sharia, what is it?

By Rebecca Figone

Florida Judge Defends Imposing Sharia Law
Freedom of the exercise of religion is very important, but when that freedom seeks to invoke a new government based solely upon itself with no reverence for current law, there begins the emerging of a catastrophic problem.

Please do the legwork necessary to be an informed, awake populace. Though it may not seem relevant at this moment, be aware that it is highly relevant and imperative that one gain as much true knowledge about this as possible. This is a huge national problem, because this is going to affect the freedoms all of us hold dear, if it establishes here. People here in America need to have allegiance to this land and her laws. Our laws allow the practice and free exercise of religion, but our laws must not be sidestepped in the name of ‘religion.’ This is already occurring here, and we must stand against this ultimately for the greater good. Here is a link to a recent story concerning a relevant issue in this realm. From this link, much can be ascertained as to the way this is going to work for us here in America. Also, here is a link that will allow deeper insight into the current happenings, which can be used to follow the news on this subject.
In addition to this main link, here are 2 links to must see videos on this same subject. Never forget what is seen here, and also, be aware of what is going on in the nation of the We the People. Link 1 and Link 2.
This link is to an article from nearly a year ago by Michelle Malkin concerning a nation free of Sharia law, and Michelle also provided another link in the article to what is called Peace through Strength.
Sharia law is the antithesis to the US Constitution. It will not coexist with the US Constitution, but instead it will attempt to side step and usurp the power of the Constitution. It will win, if we stand back, apathetically and allow it to win. We don’t face it’s imminence today, but as Islam grows here, so will the desire to implement Sharia.
Here are several links for a great amount of information and clarification of what Sharia truly is:
Link 1, is about Islamic law.
Link 2, is about the 10 reasons that Sharia law is not good for any society.
Link 3, is about Islam, and its governing under Sharia law.
Link 4, is a link from the UK, but one that has relevant information regarding Sharia.
Link 5, is details about Sharia via Wikipedia.
Link 6, is a blog with a message of no Sharia in America.
Link 7, is a lesson plan for high school students that is from PBS, that is about Sharia.
Link 8, Where there is Sharia law governing the land, there is a subsequent absence of freedom.
Link 9, is about the different forms of FGM. (Female Genitalia Mutilation) This is something that is required to some extent by Sharia.
Link 10, is about the Ayatollah Khomeini’s religious teachings on marriage, divorce and relationships.
Link 11, is about the recent law change for Indonesia which requires all females to go through FGM by day 7 of life.
Link 12 and Link 13 are about the degradation of women under Sharia and Islam.

“1 – Jihad defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.
2 – A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.
3 – A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.
4 – A percentage of Zakat (alms) must go towards jihad.
5 – It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.
6 – A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.
7 – The Muslim public must remove the Caliph in one case, if he rejects Islam.
8 – A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.
9 – A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostasy 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Making vigilante street justice and honor killing acceptable.
10 – A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim.
11- Sharia never abolished slavery and sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.
12 – Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging and other forms of cruel and unusual punishments even for crimes of sin such as adultery.
13 – Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims and must comply to Sharia if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he commits adultery with a Muslim woman or if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.
14 – It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. However, the opposite is not true for Muslims.
15 – A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.
16 – Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.
17 – No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or a bathhouse attendant. Women in such low-level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.
18 – A non-Muslim cannot rule even over a non-Muslims minority.
19 – Homosexuality is punishable by death.
20 – There is no age limit for marriage of girls under Sharia. The marriage contract can take place any time after birth and consummated at age 8 or 9.
21 – Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.
22 – Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.
23 – There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.
24 – A woman inherits half what a man inherits.
25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and she has no right to divorce him even if he is polygamous.
26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.
27 – A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.
28 – The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.
29- A woman loses custody if she remarries.
30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.
31 – A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.
32 – A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Some schools of Sharia allow the face and some don’t.
33 – A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife caught in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women since he “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”
Why does it matter so much to those here in United States of America? It matters to all Americans because Sharia is the antithesis to the United States Constitution. Many will read this and think, oh that “can’t happen here.” And for those of this mind-set, here is the link for the doubter.

Islam, Sharia and Jihad

By Gadi Adelman

The greatest threat we face today is not the economy. It is not our unemployment. Throughout history our country has endured recessions and even a depression, yet throughout history, we have always come back from those bad economic times.

The greatest threat we face today is the threat of those that want to make Sharia, Islamic law, the law of the land.

Before we can combat anything, let alone defeat it, we must first understand it. Let me make something very clear from the outset. I have been studying terrorism for over 35 years; I did not set out to become an expert on Islam or Sharia law. I wanted to learn about terrorism. My studies on the history of terrorism began with the Zealots and the Sicarii 5000 years ago and continued all the way to the 21 Century. Throughout history there have been many groups, cultures and nations that have used terror, but one thing continued to be a repeating, defining factor, Islam. I could care a less if all terrorists are purple with pink polka dots, but the fact is, today, terrorists are by far Muslim and I speak and teach on fact.

I am not saying all Muslims are radical. I am saying there is no moderate Islam. There are plenty of Muslims who aren't actively furthering the cause of jihad. But that doesn't mean that there is a form of Islam that is peaceful and non-supremacist.

Islam is a political theocracy with a religion wrapped inside it.

Islam, that would be all “Muslims”, believe that all prophets from both the Old and New testaments were Muslim. This includes Adam, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses and even Jesus. Muslims believe that each and every person is born a Muslim and then the parents corrupt them with other religions or ideals.

The literal translation of Sharia is path or path to water. ‘Šar??at All?h’ (God’s Law), refers to the legal framework within which the public and private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Islamic principles of jurisprudence and for Muslims living outside the domain. Sharia deals with all aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, economics, banking, business, contracts, family, sexuality, hygiene, and social issues. Muslims do not believe in man-made laws. All laws come from Allah as is in the Sharia.

Before we can understand Islam or Sharia law, we need to answer one very important question. Why? Why do they hate us? What did we do to offend the Muslim world? The reality is that Islamic radicalism started rising in 1928. In 1928 the Muslim brotherhood, the oldest Islamic terrorist organization in the world was founded in Egypt. In 1928 we did not even have a foreign policy that was in support of Israel, because Israel was not even in existence. People believe it is because of our support for Israel, Bush’s Foreign policies and we’re on Arab soil. This is false; one only has to look at the formation of radical Islam. So if isn’t our foreign policy or our support for Israel, what is it? Why was the Muslim Brotherhood formed in 1928? In order to understand it you have to understand the history of Islam. You have to understand the life of the prophet Mohammed and his teachings; you have to understand the books of the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sura. Unfortunately most people don’t understand the religion. You’d be hard pressed to get someone to read the bible, let alone the Quran.

The Islamic Empire, also known as the Ottoman Empire ended between 1922 and 1924. 1924 is also when the President of Turkey, President Ataturk gave women the right to vote after he became President, he gave women the right not to wear the Hijab, he gave women the right to get an education, he gave women the right to marry who they want and how they want to live their lives. The Muslims throughout the world called him the “Jewish Agent” because they believed his mother was Jewish and that was what influenced his life. So, the Islamic Empire ended in 1924, less than 100 years ago. Most people do not know history; they think of WWII as ancient history.

After Ataturk ended the Islamic Empire, only 5 years later a group of Muslims in Egypt, were feeling so humiliated, how could Judaism and Christianity liberate itself from Islam? After all, Islam is superior to all other religions, after all Muslims are superior to all other people; they founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 to bring back the Islamic Empire. That is what started Radical Islam on the rise.

The Muslim Brotherhood today is the oldest terrorist organization in the world with over 70 offshoot terror organizations including al-Qaida and Hamas. The second in charge of al-Qaida, Amin al Zawahiri was one of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt before he joined al-Qaida. This is what most people don’t realize, they think, oh, if we just eliminate al-Qaida all of our problems are going to be solved. Our problem is not going to be solved, because our problem is a radical Islamic ideology wrapped in religion that is rising all over the world to bring back an Islamic Empire that was intolerant of all other people and that is what we are truly fighting today.

The MB is so organized and focused that in 1982 the MB wrote a plan, a 100 year plan to infiltrate and dominate the west and establish an Islamic government on earth. In the counter terrorism circles this plan is known as the “project”. What makes the project so concerning is because it gives tactics and proposals for the MB and different Islamic organizations as to how to infiltrate the west and how to establish an Islamic government on earth, part of their plan is how to get democratically elected Muslims on all levels of government in the west in order to influence policy and advance Islam. They talk about how to set up different Islamic organizations, human rights organizations, and civil rights organizations in order to advance Islam in the west. They talk about how to maintain the appearance of moderation in order to advance Islam in the west, they talk about how to work with like-minded organizations, progressive organizations that share similar goals and this is why we see for example the ACLU working with CAIR (Council on American and Islamic Relations) The ACLU is being used by groups like CAIR who are basically the propaganda arm of Hamas in the US, in order to advance Islam in the US.

This is the MB document, the “project” that was submitted into evidence in Dallas, TX in the Holy Land Foundation trial from 2007, 2008. On the last page is a list of all the organizations that would be working in the US as an arm of the MB, it lists 29 different organizations which include the ISNA (the Islamic Society of North America) and The MSA (the Muslim Student Association), to give you an example, the MSA has more chapters on American College campuses then the Democratic and Republican parties combined.

The Motto of the Muslim Brotherhood is:

- Allah is our objective.

- The Prophet is our leader.

- Qur'an is our law.

- Jihad is our way.

- Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.

The Muslim Brotherhood own statement “the MB must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is…

Yes, The MB, the organization that our own government just recognized in June of this year.

Our government has been infiltrated along with the Pentagon, the FBI, the CIA, the State Department, including the White House. This is not my opinion, but fact stated by many others including Islamic Imams and scholars.

At his very hour, ten years ago today, Flights 11 and 175 had already hit the towers and the towers along with those inside became rubble and ash leaving 2606 dead at the WTC, 87 dead on AA flight 11 and 60 dead on United flight 175.

AA Flight 77 had already crashed in to the Pentagon leaving 125 dead along with 59 dead on the plane.

United 93 had gone down in Shanksville PA leaving 40 dead, total number of those murdered was 2977. 9/11 was not a tragedy, it was an act of war.

I came back to the U.S. From Israel in 1981, long before most people had ever heard the words "Jihad", "Sharia" and for many, even the word "Islam".

During that same year while interviewing with FBI, the interviewer laughed at the objective on my resume;

Short term objective: to secure employment in law enforcement

Long term objective: to specialize in anti-terrorism

While laughing he said to me,

"This is America, we don't have terrorism!"

I told him to wait ten years and remember the word "Jihad".

I was only off by two years, not bad for off the top of my head, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was the first real Islamic terrorism to come to the shores of America.

It was obvious to me that sooner, rather than later, America would be just another statistic in the long list of countries to experience terrorism, but I had no idea that the scale of one planned attack would be so severe and devastating. Unfortunately, neither did those tasked with our National security.

Since 9/11/2001 I have written many an article and given many a lecture on our national security, creeping Sharia, terror cells within the U.S. and the overall politically correct climate that concerns all the afore mentioned.

What is most depressing is that we as a nation have not gone forward in combating any of these things; we have, if anything, gone backwards.

Week in and week out I write about anti-Semitism being on the rise not only here in America, but throughout the world while the Muslims scream they are the victims.

Yes, somehow, the Muslims are always the victims now; it probably would be a case where they scream “Islamophobia” such as in the recent case at the Playland Park in NY over a safety rule that prevented Muslim women from going on some of the rides while wearing their religious head scarves. Hello? Do we need to draw you a picture of what can happen if your head scarf gets hung up while on a ride such as a roller coaster?

Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East has been shunned by the current administration. Also, let’s not forget how Obama has told Israel they need to go back to the indefensible 1949 (not the 1967) lines in order to appease the so called Palestinians.

The gaping whole known as our southern borders have become a free entrance to anyone wanting to do us harm with border patrol officials admitting that only one in five are caught.

A 2006 congressional report on border threats, titled "A Line in the Sand: Confronting the Threat at the Southwest Border", was prepared by the House Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Investigations, it indicated that illegals are coming in from Afghanistan, Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria, Yemen along with members of Hezbollah.

The mosque at ground zero is still a go; of course that is not its name. It will be known as the "Cordoba mosque", no, wait it changed to the "Cordoba house", no, wait it changed to a civic center, no a cultural center, no, now it’s going to be called "Park 51".

It sounds less intrusive that way and of course, it's much more PC to call it the Park 51 Cultural Center, then a mosque, after all, a mosque is where all 19 hijackers were indoctrinated and heard the Jihad rant of “death to America”.

Sharia courts have sprung up in Texas and Christians have been arrested in Dearborn, MI for... Being Christians.

Many states have attempted to pass laws outlawing or banning the use of Sharia law when judges decide cases in their states, but of course as we all know Sharia can't happen here because it is incompatible with our Constitution.

However, for some reason, even though it can never ever happen here and Muslim organizations such as CAIR keep reassuring us of that, they file suit each and every time to make sure these laws never see the light of day.

Honor killings not only continue to happen, but are downgraded from first degree murder and yes, in one case even ruled a suicide. Darn that Fatima Abdullah for banging her head on a coffee table until she was dead.

A Muslim woman that was raped, imprisoned, and assaulted by her Muslim husband, who admitted to all this, was heard and decided upon in New Jersey Superior Court, the Judge who found the husband "not guilty" stated as follows,

“This court does not feel that, under the circumstances, that this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited.”

Luckily, this case was overturned by the appellate court, with the appellate court saying,

"…the Judge was mistaken". Really? Mistaken?

Currently there are at least 35 known camps in the U.S. that are actively teaching jihad ideology and paramilitary training. Terror camps within our own borders. To quote my friend and colleague Erick Stakelbeck, from his book “The Terrorist Next Door” page 71,

“Muslims of America, according to a 2006 Department of Justice report, has some 3000 members nationwide and operates up to 35 such compounds in rural areas across 19 states, including Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.”

Hundreds of mosques throughout the U.S. are teaching that same anti-American jihad ideology as documented throughout the entire book “Muslim Mafia” by Dave Gaubatz. Investigators worked undercover for two years, some of whom even worked within CAIR headquarters as interns to bring forth proof of what mosques and Muslim Organizations in the U.S. are accomplishing in their fight to Islamize America right under our politically correct noses.

What’s more is that the number of mosques in the U.S. has more than doubled in the last ten years. What exactly is being preached inside these buildings that are part of the “religion of peace”?

As of today there have been 17,720 deadly terrorist acts all in the name of “Allah” or “the religion of peace” since September 11, 2001.

The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) has spent billions of dollars to create beautiful window dressings to make the flying public feel safe while in reality we are less safe than prior to 9/11 according to pilots as well as security experts. In the article also by Dave Gaubatz, “A Retired Airline Pilot Speaks Out on Airline Security,” a pilot interviewed stated,

“In reality, our airlines are not safer for our families. They are more vulnerable to attack and infiltration than prior to 9/11.”

"Enhanced pat downs" have done more for late night comedians than for the traveling public. Two weeks ago I flew out of LaGuardia airport in New York and went through nothing more than a basic metal detector, no pat down, no backscatter scanners, and no wand. On the other hand, people have accused TSA of molestation and sexual assault.

Recently an award winning chef admitted he had accidentally flown with four large knives in his carryon bag out of Chicago. In March TSA somehow missed a bag with three box cutters that fell out of a man’s carry on once he was on the plane and this past November, Adam Savage the host of Mythbusters reported that he accidentally managed to get 12 " razor blades through airport security. So much for that enhanced security.

In 2010 when Obama introduced his National Security Strategy the words “Radical Islam,”” terrorism” and “Jihadist” were removed from all national security documents and our administration said we are no longer at war with terrorists. John Brennan, the Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and Assistant to the President stated,

“The President’s strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our enemy is not ‘terrorism’ because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not ‘terror’ because terror is a state of mind and as Americans we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists’ because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenant of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children.”

Just after Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood shooter, gunned down 13 fellow soldiers in cold blood while screaming “Allah Akbar” (14 actually died since 21 year old Francheska Velez was 3 months pregnant) President Obama was quicker to react to those calling the Foot Hood shooting terrorism than he is at picking up his golf clubs. He stated,

“We don't know all the answers yet and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.”

The warning signs were blatantly ignored due to fear of repercussions and not being politically correct as now admitted by many who knew Nidal Hassan and his radical Islamic views. The NY Daily News reported in January 2010,

A senior White House official likened the failure to connect the dots on Hasan's erratic behavior and affinity for radical Islam to the intelligence breakdowns that led to the Christmas Day underwear bomber incident over Detroit.

I have stated since 9/11 over and over again that “political correctness would be the death of America”, it certainly was partially responsible for those that died at Foot Hood.

The Obama administration has had almost more “Muslim Outreach Programs” than Obama has had vacations. During one such program the FBI allowed a known Hamas operative into a six week program that included tours of top-secret areas of our National Counterterrorism Center, after that came to light, the FBI attempted to deny it ever happened.

Political correctness has all but done away with the word "God", and Allah forbid you so much as even think about saying a prayer at the tenth anniversary 9/11 Memorial service.

The Ground Zero Cross may not be allowed at the Memorial/museum either as there is a lawsuit trying to keep it from being there as explained by the Washington Post,

The group actually claims that its members are experiencing “dyspepsia [upset stomach], symptoms of depression, headaches, anxiety, and mental pain and anguish,” not from the devastating destruction of life caused by the terrorists on 9/11, but as a “direct and proximate result of the unconstitutional existence of the cross.” That’s not a line from a blog post, a press release, or a fundraising letter; that is the actual legal argument presented by the American Atheists in their complaint.

Yes we have come a long, long way in the last ten years; it makes me wonder what our money ten years from now will have printed on it, perhaps, “One nation under Allah”?

Saturday, September 17, 2011

My Interview with SIOTW

By Pulp Ark

When and why did you get involved in the anti-Islamic movement?

When I decided to leave Islam 2.5 years back, I felt that I needed a sanctuary, a place that I can share my feelings about Islam. I started with an Indonesian forum run by Ali Sina. It's a resourceful place in finding the truth about Islam. Suddenly, I was immersed into the forum, confronting Muslims. I made many friends with fellow apostates and infidels that fights along with me.

Six months later, having understood the threat is global, I suggested to my friends to create special FB accounts to reach much wider audience. We continue our fights there, making notes, postings vile Islamic activities and events. A few of our English speaking friends, including me, have began to reach the West.

I started to change my strategy, while it was worthy to confront Muslims, making allies with the West is as important, as Islam has a major problem with Judeo-Christianity it's trying to corrupt. Earlier, I was tempted to befriended with some reformers, much like my old self. Gradually, I became assured that Islam cannot be reformed from within. It can only be destroyed from without.

I must name the few that shaped me into this today, Christopher Logan and Vin Ienco. There are other big names that I keep on losing due to my recycling FB account, such as Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and Bridget Gabriel. In any case, I am proud to be among the growing nameless others that work around the clock dedicating themselves in exposing Islam.

I learn further that Islamic goal in world domination is actually recorded as the End of Time prophecy in the Bible; and the Mark is actually very Islamic. All the events in the Middle East and America now are as if they are staging for the Last Trumpet in Jerusalem. This fuel me further to my work, to be the instrument of God, to glorify Him in the name of Christ. I now have a deep love struck with Israel, the vessel of Blessings that Islam try to destroy.

Islamophobia is an irrational fear or prejudice towards Islam and Muslims. Are you an irrational Islamophobe?

I based my work on the Islamic teachings. They clearly condone lies and violence in attaining their goals. To be irrational, is to still think that Islam can be reformed, that those cuddly nice Muslims are the true representative of Islam. It is either they are point blank lying, or sincerely gullible to still think they can reform Islam, or just simply ignorant about the real teaching of Islam.

Muslims are equip with a fair amount of irrational hate towards Infidels alike, especially towards Jews and Christians. All whatever 'goodness' are just for among themselves. And they are being indoctrinated since young about the 'beauty' of Islam. So, a skin deep Muslim with what left of humanity in his or her heart, when happen to learn more about Islam, will either becoming a terrorist, or an apostate like me.

Much like the age of reformation when Bible becoming available to the known languages, it brought revolutionary changes that helped to enlighten the world. But as for Quran, in this age of the Internet, we are witnessing the rise of Islam around the world with ever increasing body counts and countless mistreatment to women.

Did you receive any threats from Muslims or others because of your involvement in the anti-Islamic movement?

I live among them. My friends, and my greater families are still Muslims. I can be consider lucky, as a few of the open minded ones may have known what I do now, and still have not done anything, just yet. And since I am active only in the cyberspace, any threats are somewhat isolated for now.

What aspects of Islam do you find most problematic and disturbing?

Their ability to lie. Good Muslims will never cherry pick the verses. Both versions works as intended. The violent ones for the obvious, and the sweeter ones to lace them.

To the uninitiated, there is a doctrine of Abrogation in Islam, that for any contradictions, the latest ones has the weight. While Quran has no context whatsoever, especially chronological, Hadis (Muhammad's sayings) and Sira (Muhammad's biography) can help to sort this out.

Quran is just Muhammad's tool to satiate his lust of power, sex, and money. Began with bad child upbringging, he suffered an incurable narcissistic personality disorder. He fantasized Allah as his slave to his biddings.

Do you think Israel is a good ally in the struggle against Islamization?

Of course, and Jerusalem is the key. Just because Muhammad had a dream departing from Jerusalem, riding a female headed winged donkey to meet his moon god, just to ask him how many times shall his followers moon him, Muslims had made the city sacred to them.

I am at a dismay that America is at its lowest now, at the time of this Islamic rising. Israel should have its full support from America at this critical time. My saying, please stop dealing with Islamic oil for indirectly financing their Jihad against us, use Israeli instead, and protect Israel at all cost.

God has promised that never again will Jerusalem be controlled by the Gentilles. So, any attempt of it, will simply means a full scale War.

Who is a moderate Muslim?

They are just a facade of the real Islam. As Anjem Choudary would say, there is no moderate vegetarian. So, those nice Muslims neighbors we know, they are just sleeper cells. Try to ask their opinion about the Jews. If they are OK, then they really musunderstand Islam.

How do you see the future with current immigration policies? And what needs to be changed?

Please stop importing Muslims. Yes, profile them by this dangerous belief. Put priority on the persecuted minorities and apostates. Yes, Muslim can lie as far as pretending that they are apostates, therefore, resources will be required for investigating them.

OK, this sounds far fetched, and to do this, Islam must first be demoted from its religious status that it's enjoying now, to a mere a political movement. And this will need incitement. Precisely what the people like me are doing now.

Multi-culture is beautiful, only without Islam please.

What do you see as the biggest challenge when it comes to informing people about the dangers of Islamization?

Liberal thinking. The thinking that everyone, or all religions is good. That is why I am stressing about the nature of Islam. The way it is perpendicular with the course of humanity.

Best way to neuter this is to frequently having open debates about Islam through all possible media. Here is a good one. This will greatly helping the general public to know Islam first hand, from the Muslim themselves, as it would be very hard for them to lie publicly.

What do you say to people calling you a racist or a Nazi because you oppose Islamization?

Islam is not a race. And if they insist that discrimination is a form of 'racism', then so be it. Islam is so dangerous that it deserves and must be discriminated. Being mugged might make you lose your money. But with Islam, it will make sure that you and your descendants be transformed into them, and mug others.

Do you think mainstream media is pro-Islam biased?

Yes, based on the spirit of the Liberals. I sincerely hope that by next year, the tide will change, once the Republicans take control of the WH again, hope this time with no nonsense politically correct Islamic enablers. I just hope it won't be too late though.

Muslims want to use Sharia (Islamic law). In what way does it clash with our Western civilization and our laws?

People like Dahlia Mujahid, Obama's Islamic envoy, works hard spewing Taqiyya (Islamic sanctioned Lies) about the beauty of Islam. Saying that Sharia is a parallel system that fully compatible with our civilizations. The truths is, it is a complete system that intrudes your very life, with myriads of sadistic punishments.

Is Islam a religion of peace?

Islam will attain peace through world domination, and they are supposedly doing it before the End of Time, or so they prophesied. Which is true, I think. For when Islam reach that state, all civilizations known to men, will be destroyed. And they shall continue fighting each other as usual, until they all be destroyed too. Peace.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Jihad & the Doctrine of Perpetual War

Lest we forget, during our mourning for the ten year anniversary of the 9/11 holocaust and its victims, we still battle violent Muslim Jihadists. In fact, there is not only a Muslim holy war being waged upon the battlefields of Afghanistan, but also in the murkier shadows where terrorists eviscerate their unsuspecting victims.

But what is Jihad? The doctrine of Jihad has been both debated publicly and also ignored in the years after the 9/11 attacks. Yet it has a set meaning and use since Muhammad’s days, despite much propagandizing and obfuscations by its apologists. Further, any group opposed by violent Islam shall be permanently attacked since Islamic radicals demand submission or death. Jihad, the Western idea of the Just War, and September Eleventh are the topic of this brief essay, lest we forget the cause of the terrorist butchery.

I. September 11th, 2001

It is a matter of the most solemn remembrance that we recall what happened on September 11th, 2001 in New York City, NY, Washington, DC, and Pennsylvania. As one source describes it:
The September 11 attacks were a series of four coordinated suicide attacks upon the United States in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area on September 11, 2001. On that morning, 19 terrorists from the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda hijacked four passenger jets. The hijackers intentionally crashed two planes into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City; both towers collapsed within two hours. Hijackers crashed a third plane into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. A fourth jet, United Airlines Flight 93, crashed into a field near Shanksville, PA, before it could reach its intended target in Washington, D.C., after the passengers attempted to take control. Nearly 3,000 died in the attacks.

II. Two World Views: Western & Islamic

A. Muslim World View: Fundamentalism with no Reformation or Enlightenment

To understand the doctrine of Jihad, we must first realize how differently the Muslim world view is from that of the West. Briefly, in the aftermath of the fall of the Roman Empire, the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Enlightenment, the West developed a “liberal” manner of dealing with politics, government, and religion. The root word and idea were “liberty,” or that freedom should be allowed people in what they believed and how they acted, as long as they did not disturb others. This became the classical liberal doctrine of tolerance in the midst of free expression of belief.

The result was the “Social Contract” which delivered peace as a side benefit of allowing matters of conviction to remain private choices. This resulted, ultimately, in the founding of America upon the classic expressions of political liberalism—the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, along with the Bill of Rights. The results have revolutionized the world.

On the alternative, Islam has never experienced a Reformation, and is therefore still highly impacted by the values of 7th century Arabia. Whereas the West developed the nation-state theory of sovereign lands, doctrinaire Muslim writers never countenanced such an idea. Instead they taught the Quranic view of society and religion, where church and state are one, no democracy is possible, and the land is ruled by a strong man.

B. Essential Elements of Islamic Convictions

First, the law stands at the heart of Islam, not the religion, according to Joseph Schacht. He wrote,
The sacred law of Islam, the Shari’a, occupies a central place in Muslim society, and its history runs parallel with the history of Islamic civilization. It has often been said that Islamic law represents the core and kernel of Islam itself and, certainly, religious law is incomparably more important in the religion of Islam than theology.
Second, there is no doctrine of practical separation of mosque and state, even if some Muslim states have practiced such. Third, there are two possible spheres of reality—the lands of the believers versus that of the unbelievers. Fourth, only believers hold unmitigated rights of any kind, but only when they hold tight to the one true faith.

C. House of God v. House of War

The practical outcome of these Muslim beliefs is to turn the world into two opposing, and perpetually antagonistic spheres—House of Allah versus the House of War. This fact then explains why true Islam and those who refuse to accept the teachings of Muhammad must always remain at odds. As Bernard Lewis describes this Muslim idea in The Multiple Identities of the Middle East:
The world is divided into the House of Islam and the House of War, the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-harb. The Dar al-Islam is all those lands in which a Muslim government rules and the Holy Law of Islam prevails. Non-Muslims may live there on Muslim sufferance. The outside world, which has not yet been subjugated, is called the “House of War,” and strictly speaking a perpetual state of jihad, of holy war, is imposed by the law. The law also provided that the jihad might be interrupted by truces as and when appropriate. In fact, the periods of peace and war were not vastly different from those which existed between the Christian states of Europe for most of European history.
The law thus divides unbelievers theologically into those who have a book and profess what Islam recognizes as a divine religion and those who do not; politically into dhimmis, those who have accepted the supremacy of the Muslim state and the primacy of the Muslims, and harbis, the denizens of the Dar al-harb, the House of War, who remain outside the Islamic frontier, and with whom therefore there is in principle, a canonically obligatory perpetual state of war until the whole world is either converted or subjugated.

III. Jihad

A. Moral Struggle v. Holy Warfare

It has been stated many times that the term “Jihad” in Islam is more properly defined as “holy struggle” than “holy war.” Reuven Firestone, in Jihad, The Origin of Holy War in Islam, points out that the word “Jihad” has no direct connection to war. Yet, it would be better to state that Jihad is a holy struggle most often expressed in terms of violent attack against Islam’s enemies. Firestone states,
When the word is used without qualifiers, like “of the heart,” or “of the word,” it is universally understood as war on behalf of Islam (equivalent of Jihad “of the sword”—jihad al-sayf), and the merits of engaging in such Jihad are described plentifully in the most respected religious works.
Firestone describes how the doctrine of Jihad developed, especially as holy war was allowed by Allah to evolve because of the obdurate attitude of the unbelievers. Eventually this developed into a doctrine of total war in the name of God.

B. Jihad as Bloodshed

And yet, Jihad remains a duty of all Believers, both individual and the group, as explained by Rudolph Peters in Jihad, In Classical And Modern Islam. For example, there is an immediate duty to kill all pagans, aka polytheists, according to Peters, who writes,
The only reasons an unbeliever should be put to death…is their unbelief. This motive then goes for all unbelievers…Enemies must not be tortured nor their bodies mutilated. The Muslims agree they may be slain by weapons. Controversy exists, however, concerning whether it is allowed to burn them by fire.
As to whether once could wage total war, and thereby also destroy the homes and property of unbelievers, Peters reports that while the Prophet’s right-hand man Abu Baker did not allow this, Muhammad did himself.

C. Seven Aspects of Legal Jihad

Peters lists Seven aspects of the legal doctrine of Jihad: 1. Legal Obligation: Muslim communities are everywhere held responsible to wage violent Jihad, even if all members cannot bear a sword; 2. The Enemy: All pagans—ie polytheists (everyone not Muslim, or dhimmi, being Jew or Christian). Christians and Jews can also be targeted under many circumstances; 3. Damage Allowed: Any confiscation or destruction of property, and the enslavement, jailing or death of enemies—except women and children; 4. Prerequisites of Warfare: The enemy must hear first the call to Islam before being attacked; 5. Maximum Number of Foes One Must Not Retreat From: Double the size of the forces of the Muslims; 6. Truce: A truce may be entered for advantage or from fear of extinction; 7. Aims of Warfare: To force dhimmis to either convert or pay the war truce tax “Jizya,” and either convert or kill the rest.

D. 164 Jihad Verses

There are said to be 164 verses in the Quran extolling Jihad. Here are just two:
[2.190] ...fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you…[2.191] And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.

IV. Western v. Muslim Just War Theory

A. Western Just War: 6 Elements

In the history of the West, appearing very early, was the notion of the Just War, first articulated by Augustine, but well-outlined by Aquinas and Grotius. According to the standard theory, a Just War must have six elements to be defensible:
  1. The war must be for a just cause.
  2. The war must be lawfully declared by a lawful authority.
  3. The intention behind the war must be good.
  4. All other ways of resolving the problem should have been tried first.
  5. There must be a reasonable chance of success.
  6. The means used must be in proportion to the end that the war seeks to achieve.

B. Islamic Just War

Peters explains that in the classic Muslim war theory, any battle with unbelievers was considered justified. Writes Peters,
The classical doctrine of jihad considered all wars against unbelievers as legal wars, sanctioned by the Shari’ah. In Fact, the Shari’ah required that the head of state organize once a year a military raid into enemy territory.

V. Doctrine of Perpetual War & the Cult of the Assassins

A: Submission

Perhaps the most unnerving aspect of the West’s unwanted war with Islamic terrorism is its permanent tenor. On the one hand, America and other nations have long vexed Islamic societies because of our freedoms and irreverence. On the other, the mere existence of a large group of highly successful unbelievers guaranteed at some point violent Islamists would try to take us down. Radical Muslims have launched surreptitious attacks against foes for a thousand years. This will not end till either they, or we, prevail.

Let us not forget that Islam means “submission” to the will of Allah. This denotes the group as a political entity, which all history proves. To become a Muslim merely means verbal assent to Allah and Muhammad. Therefore, conversions by sword is not merely possible, but clearly the most efficient way to bring the world to Allah. And, for example, while Muslims might sign a treaty—up to 10 years long—there is no shame in breaking such, whenever it benefits Islam. In fact, this is highly recommended.

B: Assassin Cult

Consider the murderous cult of the Assassins, an offshoot of Islamic Ismailis. The Assassins would take young boys, groom them into fanatics, then allow them to infiltrate a hated foreign enemy’s camp. There they would assiduously work to gain trust, often over decades, until they got close enough to a king or leader to drive a dagger into his heart when least suspected. Says one writer:
Marco Polo brought the remarkable tale of Hasan-i Sabbah and his cult of Assassins to the West. He visited their former stronghold, the fortress of Alamut (“Eagle’s Nest”), near Tehran, in 1273 C.E., 150 years after the death of Hasan. 
Beginning just before the First Crusade, the Assassins held the Muslim world in the grip of fear. From his mountain keeps, Master Hasan directed campaigns of holy terror against rivals. Rulers could be struck down at any moment not just by a hidden assailant, but by a beggar or holy man on the street, even a trusted member of their own households. When captured, the attackers were contemptuous of death, resisting severe torture without betraying their comrades, sometimes even naming innocent people as their supporters, causing their deaths as well. 
Hasan’s organization was clearly a prototype for modern Islamic terrorist groups. In some ways, it is eerily like Osama bin Laden’s. As one historian put it,
Hasan’s contribution to the art of assassination was that by careful selection, training, and inspiration he developed the practice into a sacred ritual and the prime weapon of a small state waging war against a great power. Thus, Alamut became the greatest training center of fanatical politico-religious assassins the world has known.
In other words, this group prizes martyrdom and murder so highly, one must assume that their entire purpose is to fight for their religion—even in the face of impossible odds. So, of course, they will not give up their war against the West. That is not in their nature or beliefs.


“The Price of Liberty Is Eternal Vigilance,” claimed Thomas Jefferson. And once we have accepted the obvious—that Islam is destined to a perpetual war against us infidels—our lives become easier. Because we are then on notice who our enemies are, and what their methods shall be. Instead of feeling sorry for ourselves, let’s instead recall that war appears the fate of mankind.

In the not too distant past, one of our greatest presidents commented upon the meaning of war and its heroes. Recall the immortal words of President Lincoln’sGettysburg Address, while we likewise remembering the victims and heroes of 9/11:
Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.
What radical Islam attempts is nothing less than the assassination of world freedom. America’s liberties are what really drive militant Muslims to want to destroy us. Their chief aim is obliterating freedom, and they shall not rest until achieving this. And unless America stands up to these religious bullies, world liberty will always be very much be at risk. 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...